Zum Inhalt springen
HovMindHovMind

Self-worth issues

The inner pot – always equally valuable

Why our sense of self-worth fluctuates, even though our worth as a person does not.

“What is my self worth?” – this question accompanies many people who come to counseling [1]. Psychologically, self-worth can be understood as the emotional evaluation a person has of themselves – distinct from the more cognitive self-concept (James, 1890; Rosenberg, 1965) [2]. Healthy self-worth does not mean being flawless, but being able to accept yourself including your weaknesses and not making your worth dependent on external approval (Stinson et al., 2008) [3].

Virginia Satir’s image of the “pot” makes this particularly vivid: self-worth is like a vessel we carry with us – sometimes well filled, sometimes almost empty. What matters is that the pot itself always remains the same, regardless of how others treat us or what we are currently achieving (Satir, 1988) [4]. This metaphor corresponds to a well-known exercise in self-worth work: a crumpled, trampled banknote does not lose its face value – in the same way, a person remains valuable, however life treats them [5].

Crises of self-worth often arise precisely when central sources of self-worth – such as achievement, recognition or belonging – begin to falter [1]. From a systemic perspective, self-worth is never purely individual: it develops and changes in the context of relationships, cultural norms and family messages that we have internalized over the course of our lives (Markus & Kitayama, 1991) [6]. Counseling therefore does not only address “negative thoughts”, but also asks which relational experiences and patterns of belonging have shaped your self-worth.

The goal is less a permanently “high” self-worth than a stable inner ground that does not depend on external circumstances – a pot that does not break under outside pressure, but can accept cracks as part of a living, human process.

Sources

  1. 1. Potreck-Rose, F. & Jacob, G. (2003). Selbstwert, Selbstakzeptanz, Beziehungen. Pfeiffer.
  2. 2. James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. Henry Holt and Company; Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton University Press.
  3. 3. Stinson, D. A. et al. (2008). The cost of lower relational security. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(2).
  4. 4. Satir, V. (1988). The New Peoplemaking. Science and Behavior Books.
  5. 5. Engelmann, B. (2019). Therapie-Tools Resilienz (2nd ed.). Beltz.
  6. 6. Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.